Netflix Standard Display Offer 468x60

Shyamalan-a-thon: Labor of Love

Finishing off metformin hcl 850 mg our Shyamalan-a-thon is a a script review. Labor of Love is one of Night’s first scripts and his first spec sale he made back in 1993 for a reported $750,000 to Fox. That’s a pretty hefty sum. So when I had the idea for reviewing this to close out the Shyamalan-a-thon, I decided to leave it to a professional and asked for a guest review from the great Carson Reeves over at Scriptshadow. Carson does daily reviews of hot scripts floating around Hollywood that range from the completely unknown to bigger works like last week’s review of Alfonso Cuarón’s next film, Gravity. If you want to be a screenwriter, there’s no better place to read analysis and learn what kind of screenplays are currently selling in Hollywood.

If you’re interested in reading the script for yourself, here’s a link to Labor of Love. Being that this is a script review, there will obviously be spoilers.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

I suppose metformin hydrochloride brand name I should start off my review by stating my opinion on M. Night.  That could be an entire article in itself so I’ll try and keep it short.  M. Night has genius in him, but I’m afraid it’s such a tiny spec of who he is that it’s already been used up.  And most of that genius, of course, was dumped into The Sixth Sense, a film I still believe has the best ending of the last 15 years.

Having said that, I’m going to make a surprise proclamation.  Night was a victim.  Yes, I said it.  Night’s success hit right at the turn of the century when we may not have had Twitter or 30 major movie blogs yet, but the 24 Hour News cycle was definitely underway, with AintItCoolNews at its peak and an entire new subculture of people who wanted to discuss movies 24/7.  In short, that time was the birth of the overhype – where nothing could live up to its buzz.  See The Phantom Menace and The Matrix sequels as other casualties of the time.

Now that’s not to say Night doesn’t share the responsibility.  This is a man who strives to make Citizen Kane every time out, not realizing that most of his scripts are more on par with Barbershop 2.  One of the surest ways to churn out crap is to overestimate your talents.  Where Night is and where he thinks he is may equal the distance between here and the sun.

Here’s my beef with M. Night.  I’ve read he has some checklist where his ideas must pass eight tests before he can commit to them.  Something about having a symbolic protagonist, four levels of subtext, a spiritual construct, a connection to a famous fairytale and blah blahblah blah blah blah.  Not to be rude but here’s an idea.  GIVE US A FUCKING MOVIE THAT ENTERTAINS!  Start with that and screw your damn checklist.  If you can give me an entertaining movie, I don’t need any of your stupid checklist items.  I mean you’ve made at least 5 bonafied terrible movies, so I think that goes to show that the checklist isn’t working.  Just drop all the nonsense and give us a film we’re going to enjoy.  Is that so much to ask?

A depressing fan's sketch of Night's downfall.

Labor of Love is one of Night’s first screenplays, selling for a pretty penny back in the 90′s, and I’ve actually read several reviews of it over the years.  It sounded to me like an overly sappy piece of garbage to be honest and my feeling is, if you make a $300 million surprise masterpiece and there’s a back catalog script you can’t get produced afterwards, it’s probably a bad script.  So with that level of enthusiasm, let’s dig in!

Labor of Love is about Maurice Parker.  Maurice is like a lot of men who’ve stopped trying in their marriages.  Inevitably your wife gets upset and after a few attempts at rectifying the situation, you give up. As a result both partners live with this cataclysmic divide between them that can last for months and sometimes years if left unchecked.  That may not be the case here but it’s getting close.  Maurice simply doesn’t do anything for his wife anymore.

That sucks for Maurice because some kid with too many bud lights in his system plows into her after a late night party, killing her.

Cut to two weeks earlier where we get a handful of scenes that drill into our heads one thing: Maurice never SHOWED his wife any love.  Ironically, instead of *showing* us this, Night *tells* us this, about 1,500 times.  The wife keeps saying to Maurice, “You never SHOW me you love me.”  “You never SHOW me you care.”  I don’t know why she’s facing Maurice when she says this because she’s clearly talking to us.  “Hey audience!  Maurice doesn’t SHOW me his love!  Remember that!  It’ll be important later!”

So Widower Maurice, who huffs like a racehorse just going up a few stairs, decides to finally SHOW his wife he loves her by walking all the way across the United States Of America.

Once he starts, a friend of his writes a story about his journey that’s picked up by the local media.  It causes a bit of a stir, but more importantly it notifies Adelle, Maurice’s niece, to what he’s doing.  As a doctor, she’s convinced that Maurice’s lack of exercise will result in him dying on this trip so she goes on a massive search to stop him.

Along the way, Maurice runs into a handful of obstacles.  He gets beaten up by a couple of hicks from Indiana.  He saves some mom and her kid after a car wreck.  And he gets really really sunburnt.  I mean we’re talking don’t-touch-me-that-hurts sunburnt.

In addition, we keep flashing back to Maurice and his wife’s past – where they met, where they had their first kiss, where they had life-changing conversations.  For example we find out she wanted kids but he didn’t.  This is presented as a big deal but since kids aren’t part of the plot in any way shape or form, it feels more like Night trying to push any emotional button he can find.

Anyway, in the end, beaten and bruised, his organs bleeding internally, barely able to place one foot in front of the other, he trudges forward to the California ocean.  Does he make it?  Oh, wouldn’t you like to know.  And I’d tell you if I thought you cared, but you don’t.  I know this because this screenplay made me want to suffocate myself in animal excrement.  Show me you love me?  More like show me a story.  Sappy ugly blechy chewey yucky mucky nonsense.

Okay, where to begin.  This whole screenplay is built on a lie.  Not a lie lie, but a screenplay lie.  It’s vapor, and I’ll explain what I mean by that.  Night didn’t apply basic Screenwriting 101 tools here.  He *told* instead of *showed.*  This is what I was referring to earlier and the irony is thick since that’s what the whole story is about (*showing* his wife love).  Instead of a series of events that SHOWED Maurice not caring for his wife, we’re TOLD over and over again by her that he doesn’t care.  “You don’t care about me.  You never do anything for me.  Why aren’t you showing me that you love me?  You need to show me you love me.  You wouldn’t walk across the country for me.”  Whenever your dialogue is on-the-nose, it kills any realism you hope to achieve because in real life, people don’t walk around saying, “You don’t love me.”  They don’t give out instruction booklets that explain exactly what you have to do to prove your love.  They argue about completely insignificant stuff, with the real problem always bubbling underneath.  They avoid each other.  They settle into a tension-filled routine.  The second characters in a screenplay change those rules and start telling each other exactly what’s on their mind, they draw attention to the fact that this is a fictional story.  And so everything that comes after it – in this case the entire movie – feels artificial.

Now on top of that, I’m sorry but I’m just going to say it – a wife who nags and nags and nags and nags is annoying.  We get ten minutes with this woman and all she does the whole time is complain!  If I wanted that, I’d get back together with my ex-girlfriend.  How are you going to root for a character who’s doing something for someone we don’t even like?   Come on now.

But the biggest reason the script doesn’t work is the most obvious one.  HE’S WALKING!

A man walks.  That’s your story??  A man WALKS??  Okay, I’m sure that if you put me in the room with some fitness guru and a doctor they could convince me with statistics and charts that walking 3000 miles is really hard and really dangerous.  Maybe you could even convince me that under the wrong circumstances, it could kill a man.  But that doesn’t matter.  Because to me and everyone else watching the movie, it’s WALKING!  I walk every day.  You walk every day.  People spend 20% of their lives walking.  Walking IS NOT DANGEROUS.  I’ve never once read a news story about a man dying of walking.  I don’t care if you light my sneakers on fire.  I’d still be able to walk to San Francisco by Sunday.

There are some things Night kinda does right here.  He creates this huge character goal which keeps the story focused.  Every character has something going on and something to do, which is more than I can say for all the amateur scripts I read.  He has a nice character arc in Adelle, the niece.  She’s dead set against Maurice walking as she thinks it will kill him.  Her reversal is one of the more poignant moments in the story.  And I will say that in the end, when Maurice is walking that last stretch of road and everybody’s lined up on the side cheering him on, it was a little emotional.

But these successes were like pebbles amongst a sea of boulders.

At the end of my reviews I usually have a section where I say what I learned from the screenplay.  One of the things I always preach is giving your main character a clear strong goal.  Labor of Love has that goal and yet it still fails miserably.  So I think I learned that that goal, no matter how strong, still has to resonate with the audience and not just the character.  WE have to think it’s interesting and worthy in order to commit, not just them.

I’ll wrap up by saying I don’t know where Night goes from here.  I’m afraid he’s become the fantastical version of Michael Bay, with the difference being that his movies don’t make any money.  If I were him, I’d stop with all this 8 layer burrito bullshit and just go back to finding a good hook, creating a few solid characters, and telling a fun story.  If he doesn’t he’s going to keep making movies where plants chase people and depressing mermaids live in pools.  Water’s probably a good place to end this review because until his movies prove me wrong, his career is squarely in the toilet.

Related Posts

  • Anonymous

    Bravo. Humorous read but also very informative!

  • http://www.escarondito.blogspot.com Escarondito

    Ouch. But I have even worse to say about M. Night when it comes to The Last Airbender

  • http://take148.com colin j. louro

    As do we. It’s a colossal nightmare.

  • http://take148.com colin j. louro

    There’s no better way to describe Carson’s review than that. And I actually liked this script a bunch, yet still enjoyed Carson’s take. Just worked for me. Maybe it’s cause I was picturing Tom Hanks the entire time, and let me tell you, he put on an incredible performance.

  • Anonymous

    Wow! Tom Hanks?! Interesting.

    As for Shyamalana ding dong…I watched a trailer for Devil preceding SP vs TW and the entire NYC audience collectively groaned. Wondering what MNS’s take is on his dashed credibility as a writer/director…most NYCers have lost all interest/faith. Just moved to LA, guessing same here..

  • http://www.escarondito.blogspot.com Escarondito

    But I guarantee our issues are different. I can’t stand M. Night because a movie property that is based and made at showing people of color is being made by an indian man and being white washed. Then he tries to assuage peoples general emotions of hurt and betrayal by saying it is till the most diverse cast in any movie period. It may be true. But it actually makes him look worse. With that action taken it is saying that no matter how many minorities they put at background imagery they can never have a minority lead. How are east asians the sole race of a country yet the main characters from their are caucasian? It it the white-must-lead-the-darkies movie trope, the same thing that took place in Avatar. Also, he has said that his main reason for casting that newcomer as the lead in The Last Airbender was because he needed a kid with proper martial arts skill necessary to pull off the part. Great point. But Colin, do you actually believe that there is no east asian kid that knows martial arts and can have his head shaved? And don’t say the kid needs to also be an actor because this kid wasn’t. And If you saw the movie it showed.

  • http://take148.com colin j. louro

    Well I don’t believe his casting was at all maliciously racist. From all the quotes I’ve read and interviews I’ve listened to it’s pretty evident that he’s delusional as to how bad this film is, and thus the racist criticisms likely escape him as well.

    However, he did once say that one of his favorite things Bout the show was it’s racial ambiguity, and that his children, for example, see themselves in Aang, Katara, Sokka, et al. There’s definitely merit in that, so honestly the race-bending issues to me are a little overblown. And in Night’s defense, you don’t see any other filmmakers getting chastised for casting like Night has been, and he’s hardly the first to adapt a series that has Asian influences, even though it’s American made to start with.

  • http://www.take148.com Jason Johnson

    When I saw Scott Pilgrim in Vegas a few weeks ago, I kid you not, 70% of the audience groaned when Night’s name popped up. I’ve NEVER seen/heard anything like it.

  • http://take148.com colin j. louro

    Haha well gotta have a dream casting in your head, right? Hanks is the ultimate everyday man

    I’m actually an NY to LA mover as well, and yes, when I saw Inception and the Devil trailer showed and Night’s name came up, there was laughter and disgust across the board. Very sad.

  • http://www.take148.com Jason Johnson

    Hollywood is notorious for it’s white main characters and minority side kicks, so in that regard, it’s a little unfair to single out and slam Shyamalan for it.

    With that said, yeah, the movie was criminally white-washed. Airbender should have had an amazingly diverse cast. It’s just another misstep…

  • http://www.escarondito.blogspot.com Escarondito

    Woah what just happened to my long comment?

  • http://take148.com colin j. louro

    Still there as I see it. Just they collapse at the bottom so you have to click the arrow to expand the comments.

  • http://www.escarondito.blogspot.com Escarondito

    No I just posted a huge one with links and everything. Whatever I’ll see if I can condense it. 1) I don’t like using the word racist or racism because most people don’t understand it’s meaning ie. reverse-racism. 2) He openly casted for “caucasian, and other minorities”. 3) He’s a man of color. Trust me the racist criticisms din’t escape him. 4) Your argument drops once we leave the face of the characters. They are drawn,facially, to be racially ambiguous, their clothes, cultre, martial arts, writing style, bending, philosphies, names, are all asian influenced. Even without factoring in their dark skin tones, they are the farthest thing from caucasian. And you know that too. 5) The race bending issue isn’t overblown. In fact it is underblown, if that is a word. Children of color were happy that a movie was being made that would have people of color as the leads. Now their message is that they can be background images but never the heads. Also, since you don’t feel that white-washing an entire cast of minority characters isn’t such a big deal, please let me know how many all minority casts there are that are made at The Last Airbender level? I’ll wait.

  • http://www.escarondito.blogspot.com Escarondito

    @ Jason Johnson.

    It is not main character white side character ethnic. It is main characters should all be minorities, make them all white. Don’t believe me? This is what the full cast would have been if jesse mc didn’t drop:

    http://gordonandthewhale.com/the-last-airbender-is-cast/

  • http://www.take148.com Jason Johnson

    I totally forgot about that horrid jesse mc casting. Specifically, I was talking about Aang. But, yeah, I watched TV series, and I agree that the entire thing should have been cast ethnically. I was just pointing out that Shyamalan isn’t the sole offender when it comes to white-washing movies.

  • http://take148.com colin j. louro

    Unfortunately, I don’t know anything about Akira so that means nothing to me. But you’re taking what I’m saying the wrong way. I’m not defending the casting at all. I’m just saying that there is never as much scorn given to anyone else with casting as there has been with Night, and it’s partly because of who Night is and what people have built him up to be.Given Night’s track record with listening to studios, I think it’s safer to assume that his statement about racial ambiguity came entirely from him and not a cue card.And I don’t really have a response to the rest of your stuff. Again, I’m not defending anything about the movie, because it’s a disgrace. I just finished my 2nd consecutive viewing of the Avatar series and I love it dearly. My only stance is that the race-bending stuff has been overblown. We live in America, and American’s make the high majority of our movies. That’s just reality. I’m a huge foreign film buff and I love exploring foreign film for many reasons, one of which is that I get to see what cultures across the world are like. Korean, French, Japanese, British, et al. Hell, I wish Kang-ho Song was cast in every movie I go see because I freaking love him as an actor. I don’t really get why you expect any American films to be filled to the brim with international casts. Sure it’d be interesting to see, but there are foreign remakes constantly that never cast minorities in the roles from the respective country of the original. There are far more important things in the world to worry about than whether or not The Last Airbender was white-washed. TLA is an American movie, made by an American director. Would it be great if the cast was more diverse? Sure, but then the studios wouldn’t be putting money behind it, because they can’t sell unknown, non-American actors, and you would never see the movie made. This blame isn’t all on Night. It’s the system itself.

  • http://take148.com colin j. louro

    And sorry, your comment went into moderation because you included links. disqus has settings against auto-approving links, primarily because of spam concerns.

  • JJ

    Chistopher Ead’s review is as shallow as usuall. The guy has some balls, I gotta admit, because for someone who just runs a blog, writting such harsh review of the work of a very successful filmaker… Carson -Christopher-, maybe when you dare to show something you’ve written, then maybe we can start judging your opinions worthy. Right now, the only thing that keeps your blog alive is the fact that you provide access to scripts, even if now you do it in the comments section under the moniker Scriptfinder. But your reviews suck. Screenwriting 101? Show, don’t tell? Bollocks, dude, bollocks.

  • http://www.escarondito.blogspot.com Escarondito

    So I guess we have hit on the point that is the central difference people have when discussing this issue. You hear what you are saying?
    “We live in America, and American’s make the high majority of our movies.”
    “I don’t really get why you expect any American films to be filled to the brim with international casts”
    “TLA is an American movie, made by an American director”
    “Sure, but then the studios wouldn’t be putting money behind it, because they can’t sell unknown, non-American actors, and you would never see the movie made.”

    WE. ARE. AMERICAN. I notice everytime white people talk about this issue, they seem to think anti-racebenders are talking about hiring a foreign cast. There ARE east asians in america, you do realize this right? And like I said earlier, find me a director who has taken an culturally driven by minorities product and completely made the main characters white WHILE keeping the minority influences and they will get my scorn. I’ll wait. And again, you can’t seem to fathom the sense of betrayal because it is a man of color, who himself admitted that he loved the fact his kids could see themselves in the role of the characters.

  • http://take148.com colin j. louro

    Like I’ve been trying to tell you along, I can’t. That’s my entire point. No one does this. And those quotes you made aren’t opinions of mine, they’re just general fact. That’s the reality of Hollywood. I wouldn’t walk into India and see a Bollywood film and be pissed there weren’t any Americans in it. Of course, American films are reaching a much larger audience, and they’d do good to try and speak more to their foreign counterparts, but many of these people running the show are morons.

    So again, I’m not sure why you’re arguing with me when I’m not disagreeing. You simply disagree with my opinion of how much of an issue the “race-bending” is. Which is a really dumb argument, on both sides. It’s just an opinion man. I’m not discussing degrees of opinion, it’s just silly.

  • http://www.escarondito.blogspot.com Escarondito

    Before I respond, I’ll say this. We both realize you will never understand how much an issue race-bending is to people of color. I doubt you ever will or any white person for that matter. There is no point at bring arguments about that.
    I’ll respond in two parts.
    1) Colin your description of the bollywood film with american actors is telling. If you subsitute white for american only does it begin to make sense. And that is the issue. You see if a bollywood film was being made about an american influenced project, you could be pissed there are no americans in there. But you could understand considering 95% of india is indian. So they probably didn’t have any whites, blacks, asians, or latinos to fill the roles. To show you lets reverse it with you as an indian. “I wouldn’t walk into america and see a hollywood film and be pissed there are no indians in it”. Indians are american too. He should be pissed. If it calls for an indian actor they have many in their nation to choose from. Once more, colin as an african-american. “I wouldn’t walk into america and see a hollywood film and be pissed there are no black people in it”. He shoudl be pissed. We are filled with black people who can take that role.

    2) That is the difference you don’t seem to grasp. Not everyone in america is white colin. They have actors who are not white. They have plenty of actors who are not white, and could play those parts. To go see a bollywood film and be angry at not seeing a white face in a movie abotu white culture is a stupid reason to be angry. India does not have a large white polpulation. It’s the idea and mindset that you and others in the industry keep up that to be american is to be white is the issue. And if you don’t believe me re read what you wrote.
    “Sure, but then the studios wouldn’t be putting money behind it, because they can’t sell unknown, non-American actors, and you would never see the movie made.”
    “Sure, but then the studios wouldn’t be putting money behind it, because they can’t sell unknown, non-white actors, and you would never see the movie made.”
    It’s in the very way you formulate thoughts man. My whole issue stems from the fact that you and others automatically assuming american means white. And we we state that we want to see minorities in the minority roles, you state how foolish ti would be to put non-americans in american roles. It would be foolish, if there already weren’t americans here to play those roles. They’re just darker than the average actor.

  • http://www.escarondito.blogspot.com Escarondito

    I can’t even call it a misstep. As colin agrees, never have we ever seen a movie so doused in another minorities culture, philosophy, and lifestyle, so much so it is completely devoid of white influence, have its main characters given to whites yet maintained the minorities background. It’s not a misstep, it is a blatant message of, “we like your things, but we don’t like you”. This isn’t a white main character with minority side kick issue, this is cultural theft.

  • http://www.escarondito.blogspot.com Escarondito

    And like I said the reason Shyamalan is getting the most vitrol is that we expect a white director to do this. We would never expect a man of color, whose people also come from the same area to give up his own culture and people like that.

blog comments powered by Disqus